• We are BuckettLaw, Wellington’s
    pre-eminent employment law firm.

    As employment law experts, we provide specialist legal advice, support and advocacy for employers and employees nationwide.
    Your first email or phone contact is free.

  • Providing timely and expert legal advice since 1998, BuckettLaw is led by leading employment law specialist Barbara Buckett. Our team of employment lawyers is committed to achieving the best possible outcome for clients, whilst also providing an efficient and cost-effective service.

  • Piecing together your Business’s Employment Relations Requirements

    BuckettLaw has extensive experience advising and representing employers from a range of industries and backgrounds. Whether you are a small, medium or large business, BuckettLaw can service all your employment relations needs.

  • Kicked to the Curb? BuckettLaw can assist

    BuckettLaw has represented a vast number of employees in work-related disputes. As a specialist firm, BuckettLaw can ensure your case, and upholding your rights, is our number one priority.

  • Located in the heart of Wellington City, BuckettLaw services clients nationwide, with a strong presence in certain regions. If you are unsure whether you need an employment lawyer, or want a preliminary discussion on your employment issue, get in touch with one of our employment lawyers right away.

We are BuckettLaw, Wellington’s pre-eminent employment law firm.

Contact Us

Ports of Auckland and ‘Casualisation’ of the Workforce

Ports of Auckland and ‘Casualisation’ of the Workforce

As we have seen with the Ports of Auckland dispute, changing an employee’s legal status to ‘casual’ can have severe consequences, both legal and personal. This article will hopefully clarify what it means to shift a full or part time employee into a casual position, and what the legal ramifications of that decision can be.

As opposed to full time work, where the employee works set days and hours regardless of the amount of work the company has at the time, casual workers are employed if and when needed, and there is no guarantee of ongoing work. Casual employment has been likened to shifts of fixed term employment, with the employment relationship only existing for the period the employee is at work. When they leave for the day, they say goodbye to their rights and can have no expectation of more offers of work. In between periods of work, the parties do not have any obligations towards each other, and employees cannot bring personal grievance claims for periods when they were not working. 

Correspondingly, employers lose some of their rights too. They have no right to demand notice of leave, cannot demand that an employee be available for work, and have no control over whether or not an employee accepts an offer of work. There have been noted instances of employers abusing a casual relationship by trying to claim full rights but no responsibilities, such as asking for notice of upcoming leave. Judges usually give such employers very short shrift.

A casual worker’s entitlement to holidays is also affected. Under s 28(1) of the Holidays Act, casual employees essentially forgo the normal 4 weeks annual leave in exchange for 8% “holiday pay” added to their wages. This means that they have no statutory entitlements to holidays. 

An employee’s legal description is therefore very important. Although the Employment Relations Act does not define a casual employee, there are certain ways of determining whether an employee is indeed casual. Simply using the term ‘casual’ in the employment agreement is far from determinative. Courts must look at a range of factors in order to determine the true nature of the employment relationship. In Lee v Minor Developments Ltd t/a Before Six Childcare Centre, Justice Shaw gave a list of characteristics of casual work. These included 

•engagement for short periods of time for specific purposes 

•a lack of regular work pattern or expectation of ongoing employment

•employment dependent on the availability of work demands

•no guarantee of work from one week to the next

•employment as and when needed

•the lack of an obligation on the employer to offer employment or on the employee to accept any other engagement 

•employees only engaged for the specific term of each period of employment. 

The Ports of Auckland dispute essentially boils down to this important issue. Tony Gibson and the Ports Board were offering a 10% increase in wages, in exchange for workers agreeing to become casual staff, working only as required. While the Ports of Auckland is attempting to save on labour costs by only having workers onsite when there are actually containers to unload, the wharfies argued that this unpredictable situation would result in disruption to family life and a possible pay cut in real terms because of reduced hours. Although the lockout has ended and the Port bosses have filed an application for facilitation, it remains to be seen who will have the final say in this very important employment matter.

 

Contact Us

P: +64 4 472 8600

Physical Address:
1/309 Willis Street
Te Aro, Wellington

Postal Address:
PO Box 6137
Marion Square, Wellington 6141

Hours: Monday-Friday 8:30AM-5:00PM

E: reception@buckettlaw.co.nz

 

Subscribe

Subscribe to receive our regular Articles and Employment Law Updates

Subscribe
Contact Us
Book a consultation

Connect with us on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn 

Copyright BuckettLaw 2017 | Designed by Expert | Powered by MoST

Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions