Personal Grievances – Unjustified Dismissals

November 2nd, 2021 - Barbara Buckett

A recent judgement by the Employment Relations Authority has ruled that Defence Force New Zealand unlawfully dismissed an employee and was instructed to award $25,000.(Stuff Post)

The employee was unlawfully dismissed by way of serious misconduct, and the contributing investigation report identifying that there were issues regarding the employees’ approach to a matter that had also been an issue in the past.  These alleged issues were never acted upon and the employee was therefore never able to provide any explanation or given the opportunity to modify/correct her behaviour.  The employer also utilised a Defence directive rather than follow a fulsome process.  The employee raised a personal grievance (PG) on the basis that she was constructively dismissed and the ruling was in her favour.

We say to employer’s and opposing parties time and again that an employer cannot capitalise on their own failure to act.  If you utilise a performance management or ill-defined/unwarranted disciplinary process to move an employee on, it is rarely going to end well for the employer in the event of a PG being raised.

Our offices are seeing an uptick in personal grievances being raised whereby employees are being catapulted into an investigation or performance process without warning or appropriately defined terms of reference. We are also seeing lack of triage of issues and a woeful lack of feedback between employers and employees.

This comes back to such simple tools – systems and communication.  It is not reasonable to impose a PIP on a person who had no prior knowledge of unsatisfactory performance.  It is not reasonable to dismiss someone who has taken an action that has never been raised as an issue previously (despite being routinely carried out).  Additionally, misconduct cannot normally be misconduct where an employee is not aware that the conduct is wrong.  As such, employers need to be timely in conveying their concerns to employees and keep detailed records of these conversations.   In most cases, employees need to be afforded the opportunity to modify their actions to meet their employer’s requirements.

If you need assistance in conducting a robust process or are concerned that you have been treated unfairly, contact us for an obligation free discussion.

Note: BuckettLaw takes no responsibility for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of our articles. Any views expressed or comments made in an article are the writers option only. The content in our articles does not constitute legal advice. If you need legal or expert advice you should obtain specific advice about your case or matter from a professional. For legal advice based on your individual situation please contact us to speak with one of our expert lawyers.

Enjoy a complimentary 15-minute phone call as a first-time offer.

Barbara Buckett

Barbara Buckett is a highly experienced senior employment lawyer with over 35 years of practice in New Zealand. She provides expert advice on all areas of employment law and has a proven track record of delivering excellent results for clients. Barbara has extensive experience in resolving workplace issues and is an experienced litigator. In her free time, she enjoys reading, traveling, working out, and fine wine and dining with friends.

Get new posts delivered to your inbox

Never miss anything!The BuckettLaw team will keep you up to date with employment law news & legal updates.

More Reading...

Free Phone Call With Our Expert Employment Lawyers

Consult our experts about your employment questions. Get a free 15 minute phone discussion.